三星 Galaxy A3 (2017) 智能手机简短评测令人瞩目的更新。 三星最新发布的中档Galaxy A3智能手机不仅更新了玻璃和金属的一体式设计，而且还做出了重大改进，例如处理器能力的增强和相机性能的改善。这是否足以告诉其竞争对手，谁是赢家？Manuel Masiero, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 04/09/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇭🇺 🇷🇺 🇳🇱 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇫🇷 Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Galaxy Series)ProcessorSamsung Exynos 7870 Octa 8 x 1.6 GHz, A53Graphics adapterARM Mali-T830 MP1Memory2048 MB Display4.70 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 312 PPI, 电容式, 16 Millionen Farben, Super AMOLED, 康宁大猩猩玻璃, glossy: yesStorage16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB , 9.8 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 毫米 耳机接口, Card Reader: MicroSD 最高 256 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计，气压计，指纹读取器，陀螺仪，地磁传感器，霍尔效应传感器，接近传感器，RGB光传感器, USB Typ C, Wi-Fi 直连, S换机助手Networking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM-Quadband (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS-Quadband (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat.4 (800, 850, 900, 1800, 1900, 2100, 2300, 2600 MHz), Downloads at 150 MBit/s, Uploads at 50 MBit/s, Nano-SIM, head-SAR 0.349 w/kg, body-SAR 1.39 W/kg, LTE, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 135.4 x 66.2Battery2350 mAh Lithium-Ion, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 17 hOperating SystemAndroid 6.0 MarshmallowCameraPrimary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.9, auto focus, LED flash, video up to 1920x1080 pixels at 30 fpsSecondary Camera: 8 MPix f/1.9Additional featuresSpeakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 模块充电器，USB C型数据线，耳机，快速入门指南, 24 Months Warranty, fanlessWeight138 g, Power Supply: 30 g
Price329 EuroLinksSamsung notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
Size comparison
HTC One A9s BQ Aquaris X5 Plus Wiko U Feel Prime Lenovo ZUK Z2 Huawei Nova Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 DIN A6 ❌
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12Lenovo ZUK Z2Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
318 MBit/s +41%BQ Aquaris X5 PlusAdreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 16 GB eMMC Flash
258 MBit/s +15%Samsung Galaxy A3 2017Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
225 MBit/s HTC One A9sMali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s -52%Wiko U Feel PrimeAdreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.2 MBit/s -76%Huawei NovaAdreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.9 MBit/s -77% iperf3 receive AX12BQ Aquaris X5 PlusAdreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 16 GB eMMC Flash
348 MBit/s +14%Samsung Galaxy A3 2017Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s Lenovo ZUK Z2Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
296 MBit/s -3%HTC One A9sMali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s -67%Wiko U Feel PrimeAdreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 MBit/s -82%Huawei NovaAdreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20 MBit/s -93%
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3click to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A3 (2017)Canon EOS 70DHP Elite X3Huawei P90.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A3 (2017)Canon EOS 70DHP Elite X3Huawei P90.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy A3 (2017)Canon EOS 70DHP Elite X3Huawei P90.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
604cd/m²572cd/m²568cd/m²574cd/m²574cd/m²568cd/m²576cd/m²576cd/m²576cd/m²
Distribution of brightness16 Millionen Farben tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 604 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 576.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.65 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 94 %Center on Battery: 574 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}Gamma: 2.09CCT: 6502 K
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.7"BQ Aquaris X5 PlusIPS, 1920x1080, 5"Huawei NovaIPS, 1920x1080, 5"HTC One A9sIPS, 1280x720, 5"Lenovo ZUK Z2IPS, 1920x1080, 5"Wiko U Feel PrimeIPS, 1920x1080, 5"Samsung Galaxy A3 2016Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.7"Screen-16%-47%-53%-55%-51%4%Brightness middle574640 11%493 -14%348 -39%512 -11%411 -28%386 -33%Brightness576609 6%485 -16%320 -44%502 -13%386 -33%394 -32%Brightness Distribution9485 -10%94 0%85 -10%84 -11%86 -9%88 -6%Black Level *0.930.440.230.580.36Colorchecker dE 2000 *2.42.8 -17%4.2 -75%3.5 -46%3.8 -58%4.3 -79%1.11 54%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *3.85.7 -50%6.6 -74%6.4 -68%11.2 -195%7.9 -108%3.35 12%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.92.6 -37%3.8 -100%4 -111%2.7 -42%2.8 -47%1.34 29%Gamma2.09 105%2.35 94%2.39 92%2.3 96%2.09 105%2.53 87%2.12 104%CCT6502 100%6477 100%7438 87%6527 100%6076 107%6589 99%6441 101%Contrast688112015138831142* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 HzThe display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise↘ 3 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise↘ 4 ms fallThe screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).
AnTuTu v6 | Geekbench 4.0 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
45549 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
75533 Points +66%Huawei Nova
63206 Points +39%HTC One A9s
51330 Points +13%Lenovo ZUK Z2
122513 Points +169%Wiko U Feel Prime
44420 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
35964 Points -21%Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
682 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1204 Points +77%Huawei Nova
840 Points +23%HTC One A9s
711 Points +4%Wiko U Feel Prime
644 Points -6% 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3292 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
2511 Points -24%Huawei Nova
2984 Points -9%HTC One A9s
2936 Points -11%Wiko U Feel Prime
2085 Points -37%3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
8550 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
18127 Points +112%HTC One A9s
10766 Points +26%Lenovo ZUK Z2
29241 Points +242%Wiko U Feel Prime
9548 Points +12%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7229 Points -15%1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7793 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
21668 Points +178%HTC One A9s
10453 Points +34%Lenovo ZUK Z2
32997 Points +323%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
6522 Points -16%1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12954 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
11532 Points -11%HTC One A9s
12025 Points -7%Lenovo ZUK Z2
20910 Points +61%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
11653 Points -10%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
490 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1342 Points +174%Huawei Nova
849 Points +73%HTC One A9s
603 Points +23%Lenovo ZUK Z2
3302 Points +574%Wiko U Feel Prime
584 Points +19%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
281 Points -43%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
407 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1252 Points +208%Huawei Nova
737 Points +81%HTC One A9s
524 Points +29%Lenovo ZUK Z2
4506 Points +1007%Wiko U Feel Prime
514 Points +26%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
235 Points -42%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1699 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1793 Points +6%Huawei Nova
1821 Points +7%HTC One A9s
1269 Points -25%Lenovo ZUK Z2
1706 Points 0%Wiko U Feel Prime
1118 Points -34%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
916 Points -46%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
312 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
856 Points +174%Huawei Nova
473 Points +52%HTC One A9s
425 Points +36%Lenovo ZUK Z2
2419 Points +675%Wiko U Feel Prime
301 Points -4%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
253 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
745 Points +194%Huawei Nova
391 Points +55%HTC One A9s
359 Points +42%Lenovo ZUK Z2
2792 Points +1004%Wiko U Feel Prime
250 Points -1%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1670 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1800 Points +8%Huawei Nova
1802 Points +8%HTC One A9s
1175 Points -30%Lenovo ZUK Z2
1648 Points -1%Wiko U Feel Prime
1034 Points -38%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
19 fps BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
31 fps +63%Huawei Nova
22 fps +16%HTC One A9s
27 fps +42%Lenovo ZUK Z2
60 fps +216%Wiko U Feel Prime
16 fps -16%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
20 fps +5%1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12 fps BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
30 fps +150%Huawei Nova
23 fps +92%HTC One A9s
18 fps +50%Lenovo ZUK Z2
91 fps +658%Wiko U Feel Prime
17 fps +42%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
12 fps 0%GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
9.8 fps BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
14 fps +43%Huawei Nova
10 fps +2%HTC One A9s
14 fps +43%Lenovo ZUK Z2
43 fps +339%Wiko U Feel Prime
7.5 fps -23%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
8.4 fps -14%1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5 fps BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
14 fps +180%Huawei Nova
9.8 fps +96%HTC One A9s
7.2 fps +44%Lenovo ZUK Z2
44 fps +780%Wiko U Feel Prime
7.1 fps +42%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
4.1 fps -18%GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7.3 fps BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
9.4 fps +29%Huawei Nova
6.6 fps -10%HTC One A9s
11 fps +51%Lenovo ZUK Z2
29 fps +297%Wiko U Feel Prime
4.8 fps -34%1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3.2 fps BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
9.6 fps +200%Huawei Nova
6.2 fps +94%HTC One A9s
2.6 fps -19%Lenovo ZUK Z2
30 fps +838%Wiko U Feel Prime
4.4 fps +38%PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5000 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
4964 Points -1%Huawei Nova
4596 Points -8%HTC One A9s
3350 Points -33%Lenovo ZUK Z2
6969 Points +39%Wiko U Feel Prime
3347 Points -33%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
4051 Points -19%BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1000 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1297 Points +30%Huawei Nova
1264 Points +26%HTC One A9s
Points -100%Lenovo ZUK Z2
2290 Points +129%Wiko U Feel Prime
290 Points -71%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
662 Points -34% System (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2185 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
2582 Points +18%Huawei Nova
2280 Points +4%Lenovo ZUK Z2
2986 Points +37%Wiko U Feel Prime
1281 Points -41%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
1380 Points -37% Memory (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1296 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
798 Points -38%Huawei Nova
1531 Points +18%Lenovo ZUK Z2
1983 Points +53%Wiko U Feel Prime
774 Points -40%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
443 Points -66% Graphics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
529 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1635 Points +209%Huawei Nova
1006 Points +90%Lenovo ZUK Z2
4335 Points +719%Wiko U Feel Prime
740 Points +40%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
415 Points -22% Web (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
666 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
843 Points +27%Huawei Nova
727 Points +9%Lenovo ZUK Z2
1071 Points +61%Wiko U Feel Prime
10 Points -98%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
756 Points +14%Legend
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash BQ Aquaris X5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 16 GB eMMC Flash Huawei Nova Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash HTC One A9s Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash Lenovo ZUK Z2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash Wiko U Feel Prime Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Samsung Exynos 7578, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1 Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3799 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
9138 Points +141%Huawei Nova
4717 Points +24%HTC One A9s
4395 Points +16%Lenovo ZUK Z2
8436 Points +122%Wiko U Feel Prime
3383 Points -11%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
3566 Points -6%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
9669 ms * BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
3465 ms * +64%Huawei Nova
8235 ms * +15%HTC One A9s
9346 ms * +3%Lenovo ZUK Z2
3290 ms * +66%Wiko U Feel Prime
10826 ms * -12%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
11796 ms * -22%WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
64 Points Huawei Nova
60 Points -6%HTC One A9s
69 Points +8%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
64 Points 0%JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
23.28 Points BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
50.1 Points +115%Huawei Nova
30.49 Points +31%HTC One A9s
27.48 Points +18%Lenovo ZUK Z2
51.7 Points +122%Wiko U Feel Prime
21.4 Points -8%Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
22.1 Points -5%* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC FlashBQ Aquaris X5 PlusAdreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 16 GB eMMC FlashHuawei NovaAdreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC FlashHTC One A9sMali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC FlashLenovo ZUK Z2Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC FlashWiko U Feel PrimeAdreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC FlashSamsung Galaxy A3 2016Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC FlashAndroBench 3-520%87%35%-6%51%-13% Sequential Read 256KB199.7228.4 14%248.3 24%210.2 5%239.4 20%270.9 36%168.8 -15% Sequential Write 256KB45.9647.03 2%75 63%68.6 49%46.52 1%137.3 199%27.27 -41% Random Read 4KB22.3236.85 65%38.19 71%21.3 -5%21.27 -5%55 146%21.92 -2% Random Write 4KB9.6212.44 29%44.63 364%34.6 260%5.64 -41%9.4 -2%10.27 7% Sequential Read 256KB SDCard75.573.2 -3%79.5 5%39.6 -48%41.98 -44% Sequential Write 256KB SDCard50.154.9 10%47.69 -5%25.6 -49%35.21 -30%
Asphalt 8: Airborne SettingsValue high23 fps very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2 SettingsValue high52 fps
... in comparison
Max. LoadIdle
30.4 °C31.3 °C30.3 °C 31.7 °C31.7 °C31.8 °C 31.6 °C31.8 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 31.8 °CAverage: 31.3 °C
28.9 °C30.3 °C30.8 °C30 °C31.9 °C32 °C30.6 °C31.6 °C31.8 °C
Maximum: 32 °CAverage: 30.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 27.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
27.1 °C27.1 °C26.9 °C 27.7 °C27.6 °C27.1 °C 27.5 °C27.6 °C27.1 °C
Maximum: 27.7 °CAverage: 27.3 °C
24.7 °C25.9 °C26.3 °C24.7 °C26.5 °C26.4 °C24.9 °C26.9 °C26.3 °C
Maximum: 26.9 °CAverage: 25.8 °C Power Supply (max.) 24.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)Compared to same class» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 45% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HTC One A9s audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.01 / 0.07 WattIdle 0.37 / 0.78 / 0.84 Watt
Load
1.52 / 2.75 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A3 20172350 mAhBQ Aquaris X5 Plus3200 mAhHuawei Nova3020 mAhHTC One A9s2300 mAhLenovo ZUK Z23500 mAhWiko U Feel Prime3000 mAhSamsung Galaxy A3 20162300 mAhPower Consumption-137%-111%-185%-193%-94%-82%Idle Minimum *0.370.87 -135%0.61 -65%1.29 -249%1.31 -254%0.66 -78%0.96 -159%Idle Average *0.781.33 -71%1.83 -135%2.28 -192%2.03 -160%1.66 -113%1.39 -78%Idle Maximum *0.841.35 -61%1.86 -121%2.52 -200%2.08 -148%1.76 -110%1.45 -73%Load Average *1.525.44 -258%3.71 -144%4.06 -167%5.45 -259%2.85 -88%2.65 -74%Load Maximum *2.757.11 -159%5.19 -89%5.91 -115%6.75 -145%5.01 -82%3.51 -28%* ... smaller is better
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
47h 42min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)
8h 52min
Samsung Galaxy A3 20172350 mAhBQ Aquaris X5 Plus3200 mAhHuawei Nova3020 mAhHTC One A9s2300 mAhLenovo ZUK Z23500 mAhWiko U Feel Prime3000 mAhSamsung Galaxy A3 20162300 mAhBattery Runtime-25%-17%-41%-18%-35%-20%Reader / Idle28621870 -35%1543 -46%1254 -56%1978 -31%H.264988717 -27%587 -41%863 -13%WiFi v1.3668504 -25%873 31%517 -23%546 -18%575 -14%628 -6%Load532328 -38%245 -54%376 -29%
Pros+ 高品质的做工
+ 防水防尘（IP68）
+ 带USB-OTG的USB Type-C接口
+ LTE，NFC，802.11 ac Wi-Fi
+ 非常明亮的调整好的AMOLED显示屏
+ 优秀的相机
+ 优秀的性能
+ 保持冰凉
+ 良好的扬声器
+ 非常好的电池续航Cons- 手机背面太滑
- 只有LTE Cat. 4
- 无移动高清链接（MHL）
- 没有双SIM卡
- 没有光学防抖
- 屏幕闪烁
In review: Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017). Review unit courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de对于已经拥有去年的 Galaxy A3 (2016)的用户来说，几乎没有升级的必要。它们具有类似的质量。当然，今年的新机型确实有一些优势。
首先，Galaxy A3（2017）现在是IP68级别防尘防水。另外，它具有USB Type-C端口，相机不再从背面突出。由于取消了先前的银色框架，机子看起来显得更加坚固，而且它运行的是最新的Android 6.0.1操作系统。
将处理器升级到更快的Exynos 7870确实对整体性能达到预期的影响。电池续航的改善更重要：由于其惊人的电源效率，Galaxy A3（2017）是一款非常耐用的机器。两个摄像头也得到了改善，在低光条件下拍摄效果更好。前置摄像头已经完成从500到800万像素的更新。
Galaxy A3（2017）并没有做出大跃进，相反，它的迭代与改进是温和有效的。
尽管4.7英寸大小易于掌控，但光滑的背面可能会引起一些用户的不满。你唯一可以做的就是去体验一下，判断手机是否太滑。作为个人，我不介意玻璃后盖。然而，该手机的缺点无法被掩饰：没有高清影音标准接口，没有双SIM卡支持，没有光学防抖。有些用户还可能会注意到亮度低于92％时的屏幕闪烁。尽管有这些限制，Galaxy A3（2017）仍然是一个质量坚实而让人尊敬的中档智能手机，很少有值得抱怨的地方。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
- 09/03/2022 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Chassis88%
Keyboard69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device89%
Connectivity48 / 70 → 69%
Weight93%
Battery89%
Display91%
Games Performance4 / 64 → 6%
Application Performance38 / 86 → 44%
Temperature94%
Noise100%
Audio70 / 90 → 78%
Camera54%
Average71%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
More articles related to this deviceSamsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Galaxy Series)Review•三星Galaxy A7（2018款）智能手机评测 |Review•三星 Galaxy A5 (2017) 智能手机简短评测 |Review•三星 Galaxy J7 (2016) 智能手机简短评测 |Review•三星 Galaxy S7 Edge 智能手机简短评测 |Review•三星 Galaxy S7 智能手机简短评测 |Review•三星 Galaxy A3 (2016) 智能手机简短评测 |Review•三星 Galaxy A5 (2016) 智能手机简短评测 |Review•三星 Galaxy J5 智能手机简短评测 |Review•三星 Galaxy S6 Edge+ 智能手机简短评测 |Review•三星 Galaxy J1 智能手机简短评测 |Review•三星 Galaxy A7 智能手机简短评测 |Review•三星 Galaxy S6 Edge 智能手机简短评测 |Review•三星 Galaxy S6 智能手机简短评测 |Review•三星 Galaxy A3 智能手机简短评测 |Review•三星 Galaxy A5 智能手机简短评测 |Review•三星 Galaxy Alpha SM-G850F 智能手机简短评测 |Review•三星 Galaxy S5 Mini 智能手机简短评测 |Review•年轻DUOS三星Galaxy GT-S6312智能手机 ...
Price comparison
Please share our article, every link counts!